1/18/2024 0 Comments Kerbal space program 1.0 too hard![]() So even out of those 385 negative reviews, it's unclear how many are due to game instability. It's also difficult to tell whether 'bugs' on a Steam review are serious game-crashing bugs, minor annoyances, or intended features that aren't working as the reviewer expected. From a quick skim of a couple of pages of negative reviews, there are quite a few complaints about bugs, together with a mix of others including a number of variations on the theme of 'this game is too hard' or '1.0 is less fun than 0.9'. It's not exactly representative, but taking the Steam reviews for example, I'm seeing 21,265 positive reviews to 385 negative ones. I would actually flip that statement on its head and argue that the seeming lack of outrage so far (and I've personally never known a gaming community of any stripe that was shy about complaining about bugs and crashes), suggests that the game is stable enough for most players. Not being able to play with full graphics settings is unfortunate but is a long way from being a gamebreaker for me. I was experiencing a lot of crashing myself under OS X (fortunately fixed by turning down the texture quality), so until recently I would have agreed. Anyone else think that we shouldn't be at 1.0 yet or is it just me? Mature replies only please. Pretty sure if any other game dev released a game that crashes all the time, there would be outrage from the buyers. It's not stable IMO and should still be a Beta version at this point. So my thought is that Squad really jumped the gun on releasing a 1.0 version. I even installed ATM to solve memory limit issues, and still get lots of crashes. ![]() With 1.0.x, I assumed it was safe to install a windows version on my windows partition. I usually play the Linux version, always have, because it just doesn't crash.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |